View Working Together View Working Together
 
  View Hertfordshire Safeguarding Children Board website

6.9 Pre-Birth Protocol, Procedures and Guidance for Pre-Birth Assessment


Contents

1. Introduction
2. Supporting the Unborn Baby
  2.1 CAF, Targeted Services
  2.2 Referral to Children’s Services, Specialist & Safeguarding Services
  2.2.1 Circumstances Requiring a Contact to Children’s Services
3. The Timing of Making a Contact to Children’s Services
  3.1 How to Make a Contact
4. Children’s Services Response to Contacts
5. Inter-Agency Information Sharing Meetings and Strategy Meetings
6. Pre-Birth Protocol and Assessment Procedures (Children’s Services)
  6.1 How Pre-Birth Assessment is Undertaken and Potential Outcomes
  6.2 Unborn Baby Where Sibling is Subject of a Child Protection Plan
  6.3 Guidance - Content of a Pre-Birth Assessment
7. Additional Guidance
  7.1 Concern: Sexual Abuse and Child Sexual Exploitation
  7.2 Concern: Mental Health
  7.3 Concern: Substance Abuse
  7.4 Concern: Domestic Abuse and Violence
  7.5 Concern: Previous Children Removed
  7.6 Other Factors and Analysis
8. When Family Plan to Move/Has Moved
9. Flowchart of the Multi-Agency Pre-Birth Protocol
10. Supports for the Pre-Birth Process
  10.1 Health Liaison Meetings
  10.2 Advice
  Appendix 1: Bibliography


1. Introduction

Serious Case Reviews about children who are fatally injured find that high percentages are less than one year of age. This relates to:

  • The physical vulnerability of the baby;
  • The baby’s invisibility in the wider community and inability to speak for him/herself;
  • The physical and psychological strain of caring for a baby in relation to the capacity of the caregivers.

It is critical, therefore, that all Local Children’s Safeguarding Boards (LSCBs) have robust procedures in place, both to identify the children most at risk and then to effectively manage their protection.

The very nature of the work dictates that the most successful preventative action is taken if these children are identified pre-birth. This early warning system can only operate in a meaningful way if there is an agreed interagency commitment to the importance of this area of Child Protection, and that professional’s work together to assess and manage the response to this high-risk group. As prescribed in Working Together (2015) the key agencies in terms of identification and intervention are Maternity services; Primary Care services; Adult Mental Health; Community Drug and Alcohol Services; Probation; Police, particularly Domestic Violence Officers; and Learning Disability Services.

This guidance is designed to better identifying those babies most at risk and promote effective sharing of information. It will support all professionals in identifying risk factors and assist in constructing meaningful plans in partnership with the prospective parents that will protect the unborn child from harm.

This guidance aims to:

  • Clarify what is meant by pre-birth assessments and the circumstances in which they should be used;
  • Set out the procedures in relation to them and provide a framework for the content of such assessments;
  • Set out the supports for all agencies to the process;
  • It is not only Assessment Teams that conduct Pre-Birth Assessments, if there is already Children’s Services involvement, the protocol must be followed as part of current and on-going work which could include other children already being subject to child protection plans or proceedings. A Pre-Birth Assessment is not necessarily something that happens in isolation.

See Information Sharing and Confidentiality Procedure.


2. Supporting the Unborn Baby

2.1 CAF, Targeted Services

Health professionals in contact with pregnant women should routinely assess the needs of the mother and the unborn baby.

Child care concerns which do not involve child protection can be referred, with the agreement of the parent for advice and support, for a Common Assessment (CAF). It should be considered where a parent has moderate learning difficulties. This may be undertaken between the midwife, health visitor and any other relevant professionals. But this must not delay a Contact being made to Children's Services when the unborn baby is deemed to be likely to suffer significant harm.

2.2 Referral to Children’s Services, Specialist & Safeguarding Services

2.2.1 Circumstances Requiring a Contact to Children’s Services

Any professional, working with expectant parents/carers and concerned about the welfare of the unborn baby must discuss and analyse the issues with her/his line manager, supervisor or designated Safeguarding Officer. If this concludes that an unborn baby is likely to suffer significant harm, or the parents/carers will require significant support s/he will Contact Children's Services about the unborn baby. At any stage professionals may consult Children's Services about whether to refer. A GP should discuss his/her concerns with the 'designated/named doctor' or designated/named nurse' for child protection in her/his Trust, if s/he requires advice.

Hart (2000) indicates that there are two fundamental questions when deciding whether a pre-birth assessment is required:

  • Will this new-born baby be safe in the care of these parents/carers?
  • Is there a realistic prospect of these parents/carers being able to provide adequate care throughout childhood?

A pre-birth assessment will look to answer these questions.

Concerns should be shared with prospective parent(s) and consent obtained to Contact Children's Services unless this action in itself may place the welfare of the unborn child at risk e.g. if there are concerns that the parent(s) may move to avoid contact (flight).

Some parents may refer themselves, as they have an understanding of the potential issues in relation to the unborn baby and are seeking help. Other prospective parents will need to be referred by others (including family and others in the community) because of concerns identified.

A Contact will be made to Children Services, by other agencies, and a pre-birth assessment would be required in the following circumstances:

  • There is significant domestic violence or escalation during pregnancy and/or honour based violence;
  • A parent has significant mental health difficulties/diagnosis. S/he may be subject to an enhanced CPA. (Care Programme Approach);
  • A parent has mild, moderate or severe learning disabilities;
  • A parent misuses substance/s - likely to have a significant impact on the health and development of the baby;
  • A parent has had a child previously removed from their care, has had contact restricted or has a child voluntarily accommodated;
  • A parent is a current looked after child or previously in care;
  • A parent of 18 years and under with concerns about sexual exploitation, trafficking or abuse;
  • All pregnant girls under the age of sixteen have by definition had unlawful sexual intercourse and should be referred to Children's Services;
  • A young person who is expectant or prospective father and is already a service user (including Targeted Youth Service, Child Looked After Team or Safeguarding Locality and Family Support Team) should be referred to the Assessment Team, Specialist and Safeguarding Services, for consideration of the need for an assessment which is likely to be required;
  • A parent is previously suspected of fabricated or induced illness;
  • A parent is suspected of being involved in a forced marriage;
  • A parent is suspected of being a victim or involved in spirit possession or witchcraft;
  • A parent whatever age is suspected or known to have previously been the victim of grooming and/or sexual exploitation, and the putative father is unknown or known to be the who groomed them;
  • The parent is a victim or involved in honour based violence;
  • Incest is suspected;
  • If the parent is known to move authorities when professionals are involved;
  • A parent/relative or associate is someone who may represent a risk to children, or has previously harmed a child. (This would include issues such as a violent history; significant criminal history; sexual offences against adults or children etc);
  • The baby once born will be living with or having contact with someone who may represent a risk to children (see above);
  • A sibling is subject to a child protection plan;
  • There are significant concerns about the home conditions, such that the baby may suffer physical neglect;
  • One or both parents’ behaviour or circumstances during pregnancy indicates that they will be unlikely to protect or care for their baby appropriately e.g. living a chaotic lifestyle with no home base; significant emotional instability; lack of preparation/awareness of the impact of becoming a parent;
  • Late booking for maternity care with an inadequate explanation;
  • If Female Genital Mutilation (FGM) is a consideration (see Female Genital Mutilation).

This list is not exhaustive and individual factors that may usually fit more comfortably at a targeted level may become more serious if there are a number of concerns grouped together. If a professional is in doubt about making a referral, s/he should always seek advice (please see ‘Continuum of Needs’ for further information regard levels of intervention).

Primary Care Services are in a unique position to be in possession of historic and current family and/or extended family information. Where significant social history or risk related issues are evident that would have potential impact on the unborn child or parenting ability to meet the child’s needs it must be contained within any interagency and multi-agency communications and referrals. As applicable advocates or language communication interpreters will be made available to parent(s) throughout the process.


3. The Timing of Making a Contact to Children’s Services

Any professional who becomes aware that a woman is pregnant and has cause to be concerned that the new-born baby may be at risk of significant harm and/or the parents would require significant levels of support to care for the child should make a referral to the Children Services as soon as possible.

Concerns will be addressed as early as possible to maximise time for:

  • Full assessment, including locating of any previous children;
  • Enabling a healthy pregnancy;
  • Supporting parents (where possible) to provide safe care;
  • Early identification of significant relative or family member who might be able to support or provide primary care.

If a mother is undecided in relation to continuing with the pregnancy, Contact regarding the need for pre-birth assessment could be deferred pending that decision, but no later than 16 weeks into the pregnancy. If a pregnancy is discontinued whether through augmentation or spontaneous process, consideration of referral to social care should be made if there are any remaining safeguarding concerns relating to a child.

3.1 How to Make a Contact

A verbal Contact will be taken if there is an immediate risk, 0300123 4043, otherwise see Referrals Procedure for full details and use Hertfordshire Child Protection Referral Form and Child Protection Form Guidance. Information Sharing and Confidentiality Procedure will be followed. The person making the Contact will seek consent of the prospective parents of the intention to contact and inform them of it, unless s/he has grounds to believe that the unborn child, exceptionally the pregnant woman, would be placed at risk if the parent(s) are informed, or it is considered that the pregnant woman will move location to avoid Children Services’ interventions (flight). A professional may disclose information about a patient/service user/client if s/he considers it necessary to safeguard a child or unborn baby or to determine the need to safeguard him/her.

Information provided by the referring agency should include all relevant historic, social, criminal and family issues and information sharing consents. The Framework for Assessment Triangle format to facilitate its inclusion in the Assessment.

Of particular importance are details about all possible male carers. These are frequently missing from referral information and subsequently from the assessment itself. Any issues of drug and alcohol use should be included, and issues of violence, both in respect of risk to the child, but also to staff working with the family. Services that have paternal involvement only must have systems that routinely enquire about dependent children and refer accordingly in relation to risks e.g. Targeted Youth Support (TYS), Primary Care, Mental Health, SEARCH (Sexual Exploitation and Runaway Children group).

All referrals must include relevant historic, social and family issues of significance to inform any future risk assessment and /or referral, that criminal searches should be done on both parents and other possible carers, and that all decisions made about information sharing should be recorded.


4. Children’s Services Response to Contacts

The Contact is received by Hertfordshire County Council’s (HCC) Customer Service Centre (CSC). A decision will be made about whether:

  • The case meets the threshold for assessment by Specialist and Safeguarding Services (Level3), and is passed to it’s Assessment Team. It is then accepted as a referral; or
  • The needs can be more appropriately met at targeted level (Level2). CSC passes the Contact to the Targeted Advice Service (TAS). TAS will consider the presenting needs of the prospective parents, and offer relevant advice and guidance to the person who made the Contact. A Common Assessment (CAF) may be appropriate, or extended family may be utilised to reduce concerns around parental coping strategies. If concerns continue, then a re-Contact back to the CSC would be appropriate.

The Team Manager (TM), Assessment Team

  • Will determine if the prospective parent(s), under 18 years of age, require an assessment concerning his/her needs in their own right. If not, this should be recorded under the Management Decision in Case note tab on LCS, including a risk assessment and clear rationale;
  • If the referral for the unborn baby meets threshold for Children’s Safeguarding Specialist Service assessment, it will be accepted by one of the Safeguarding Assessment Teams in Children’s Services. The referral will usually be considered under Section 17 of the Children Act, 1989, as a 35 day Child and Family Assessment in the first instance. However, if there are immediate safeguarding concerns or a late presentation, the Team Manager will need to determine whether a S47 Child and Family Assessment is more appropriate to address the possible risks to the unborn child.


5. Inter-Agency Information Sharing Meetings and Strategy Meetings

An Inter-agency Information Sharing Meeting will be held within 15 working days of the 35 day assessment commencing. All professionals involved in the care of the prospective parents will make themselves available to attend, or provide a written report.

The social worker will provide an up to date Chronology and Genogram to the meeting.

This meeting ensures all professionals have the same information, and contribute to the developing picture of the prospective parents and their parenting capacity. It is ultimately the role of the Children Services (CS) Social Worker to determine the levels of risk involved in any particular pre-birth assessment, but there is an expectation that this is supported by non-judgemental evidence-based information and advice from other professionals, especially those with an expertise in the areas of drug and alcohol; mental health and learning disability. The strengths of any prospective parents should be considered alongside concerns, and there should be an explicit focus on issues of equality and diversity for each family, and how these will influence its ability to care for a baby.

Within 5 working days of that meeting, the assessment should be reviewed by the TM and allocated QSW. If sufficient concern has been evidenced by professionals to meet the threshold for S47, then a Child Protection investigation should be commenced at this point and a strategy meeting held with Health and Police. The subsequent assessment should follow the standard pathways for a Child Protection investigation and be presented for an Initial Child Protection Case Conference if appropriate within a further 15 working days.


6. Pre-Birth Protocol and Assessment Procedures (Children’s Services)

6.1 How Pre-Birth Assessment is Undertaken and Potential Outcomes

The social worker will undertake the Child and Family Assessment within 35 days. The discussions from the inter-agency information sharing meeting and the Team Manager’s subsequent decision should be shared with the parents by the Social Worker, and at least three assessment visits should take place. At the end of the assessment, the Assessment Team Manager will be responsible for determining which pathway the case then takes. There are 3 possible options:

  • Concerns are allayed and/or can be managed at Level 2 in the community. The case will Step Down to a CAF, and be monitored by the appropriate Lead Professional. If necessary, the case can be re-referred if concerns re-emerge at a later stage;
  • If some concerns continue and there is uncertainty about parental co-operation, the case may continue as or return to Section 17 status. A Child in Need Plan will be developed, and the case will transfer into the Locality Team. The parents may be expected to comply with a variety of interventions, and the case may then either Step Down to Level 2 targeted services, or return to Child Protection as necessary;
  • Significant concerns continue and it is felt that the new born baby will be at risk of significant harm. With Service Manager agreement, an Initial Child Protection Case Conference (ICPC) should be convened as soon as assessments are completed. This should take place as soon as possible in the pregnancy, ideally at 18-20 weeks, but may be sooner depending on when the unborn baby was referred.

The ICPC will require the attendance of all the involved professionals during the pregnancy and those to whom the case will transfer following the birth e.g. Locality Social Worker or Health Visitor. Reports will be expected from all relevant practitioners, which must address concerns around the pregnancy and/or parenting capacity as well as areas of strength. The resultant Child Protection Plan should consider carefully the ability to manage a Protection Plan in the community and whether this will provide sufficient safeguards for the new born baby. Parents should also be encouraged to seek advice and advocacy from the Child Protection stage onward.

The first core group meeting will be designated a pre-birth planning meeting. All essential professionals and the prospective parents should attend, and a written plan constructed. This must consider:

  • Practical arrangements for mother and baby-including post natal ward monitoring;
  • Who will inform the Social Worker of the birth?
  • Plans for out of hours/emergency birth;
  • Contact arrangements with parents and other family members;
  • Discharge plans and support package-including out of area as relevant e.g. if discharging to extended family or friends address for any period or specialist setting;
  • Management of parental non-co-operation;
  • Arrangements for legal proceedings/removal;
  • Parental attitudes to the plans;
  • Health and safety issues.

All subsequent Core Group/Pre-Birth Planning meetings should incorporate the above plan in its discussion and decisions.

If the Assessment Team has concerns that the risks to the baby will be so serious that the baby cannot be protected in the care of its parents, in the community, they must consider the need for a Legal Planning Meeting at an early stage following the Pre Birth Assessment. This meeting should be held at around the time of the ICPC, and the relevant Locality Team should attend. The Public Law Outline meeting with parents should be arranged after the ICPC, and the parents should have received the letter before proceedings by the 24th week of pregnancy at the latest. Prospective parents have a right to full information about the concerns professionals hold about their ability to parent a child, and a clear understanding of the action the Local Authority intends to take in regard to their child. This should be assessed with regard to flight risk.

Please see the Pre-Birth flowchart for ideal timelines to ensure assessments and action in reasonable timescales to allow both prospective parents and practitioners’ time to address areas of concern and make appropriate preparations for the birth. Clearly, in terms of late presentation or concealed pregnancy, these timescales will need to be abridged in order to ensure that the new born baby is safeguarded. When a concealed pregnancy delivers at the hospital Social Care should always be informed and an assessment undertaken.

6.2 Unborn Baby Where Sibling is Subject of a Child Protection Plan

If a sibling group is already subject of a child protection plan and the mother is pregnant a Strategy Discussion and S47 Enquires must be completed in respect of the unborn baby, prior to presentation at an Initial Child Protection Conference (which will be a Review Conference for the siblings). The unborn baby cannot be made subject of a Child Protection Plan without this process being undertaken to provide the evidence that the unborn baby’s needs meet the threshold for the ICPC and to ensure that the evidence and decision making is fully recorded on the unborn baby’s LCS file.

If the unborn baby is made subject of a child protection plan in this way the CP flag will appear on his or her LCS record and his or her name will be added to the child protection list sent to partner agencies. This is an essential protection for the baby/unborn baby.

6.3 Guidance – Content of a Pre-Birth Assessment

A sound assessment will include what research tells us about risk factors, what practice experience tells us about how parents may respond in particular circumstances, and the practitioners’ professional knowledge of this particular family.

It will collate factual evidence to evaluate relationships between parents/ carers and between parents/carers and the unborn baby, the impact of personal history on current experiences and the current context within which the family live. This is consistent with the Framework for Assessment of Children in Need and their Families.

The Social Worker will:

  • Identify a fundamental baseline of acceptable parenting skills against which change can be monitored;
  • Read case files of any child/ren who have received a service including from another Local Authority;
  • Undertake searches regarding parents/carers/new partners, within Local Authority area, including Probation, police, any relevant adult care services, schools, colleges and Connexions, and, if appropriate in other Local Authority areas;
  • Construct a chronology, using input from other agencies, analyse and note patterns;
  • Interview parents together and separately, test out parenting capacity and develop early engagement. Note if one parent is articulate and controlling, disempowering the other parent from making an open contribution to the assessment. A parent may require significant challenge when reviewing the professional and historical information. A clear history from the parents of their previous experiences should ascertain if there are unresolved conflicts and the meaning any previous children to them and the meaning of the expected baby;
  • Consider the relevance, if any, of any past history of either parent as having been Looked After or in receipt of Safeguarding services themselves;
  • Risk assess any dog or other pet, and consult with RSPCA or similar as required.

Previous History

Practitioners should attempt to build up a clear history from the parents of their previous experiences in order to ascertain whether there are any unresolved conflicts and also to identify the meaning any previous children had for them and the meaning of the new born baby.

It will be particularly important to ascertain the parent(s) views and attitudes towards any previous children who have been removed from their care, or where there have been serious concerns about parenting practices. Relevant questions would include:

  • Do the parent(s) understand and give a clear explanation of the circumstances in which the abuse occurred?
  • Do they accept responsibility for their role in the abuse?
  • Do they blame others?
  • Do they blame the child?
  • Do they acknowledge the seriousness of the abuse?
  • Did they accept any treatment/counselling?
  • What was their response to previous interventions? e.g. genuinely attempting to cooperate or tokenistically compliant?
  • What are their feelings about that child now?
  • What has changed for each parent since the child was abused/removed?

This list is not exhaustive. There will be particular issues for individual cases that require social workers and other practitioners to gather information about past history and review past risk factors.

It is also important to ascertain parents’ feelings towards the current pregnancy and the new baby relevant questions include:

  • Is the pregnancy wanted or not?
  • Is the pregnancy planned or unplanned?
  • Is this child the result of sexual assault?
  • Is severe domestic violence an issue in the parents’ relationship?
  • Is the perception of the unborn baby different/abnormal? Are they trying to replace any previous children?
  • Have they sought appropriate ante-natal care?
  • Are they aware of the unborn baby’s needs and able to prioritise them?
  • Do they have realistic plans in relation to the birth and their care of the baby?


7. Additional Guidance

7.1 Concern: Sexual Abuse and Child Sexual Exploitation

If a child has been removed from a parent’s care because of sexual abuse and, or child sexual exploitation, the assessment should consider evidence of change and the prospective parent/carers current ability to protect. Confidence in the safety of the newborn baby will be poor if the perpetrator is the prospective father or is living in the household, there is no acknowledgement of responsibility, where the non abusing parent blames the child and there is no prospect of effective intervention within the appropriate time-scale.

If the perpetrator is convicted for posing a risk to children, it needs to be established if s/he has served a custodial sentence for sexual offences and if s/he participated in a treatment plan. If the perpetrator is already living in a family with other children, (albeit with social work involvement), this will not detract from the need for a pre-birth assessment. Maintain the focus on both prospective parents, and any other adults living in or visiting the household and do not concentrate solely on the pregnant woman.

When a person ‘who presents as a risk to children’ has been previously assessed, the qualifications of the assessor and the quality of the assessment must be reviewed, as part of any current assessments.

Relevant questions when undertaking a pre-birth assessment when previous sexual abuse has been the issue include:

  • The circumstances of the abuse: e.g. was the perpetrator in the household?
  • Was the non-abusing parent present?
  • Details of the abuse, and it’s impact?
  • What relationship/contact does the mother have with the perpetrator?
  • Assuming the man as perpetrator - however, this is not always the case, how did the abuse come to light? e.g. did the non-abusing parent disclose or conceal?
  • Did the child tell? did professionals suspect?
  • Did the non-abusing parent believe the child?
  • Did they need help and support to do this?
  • What are current attitudes towards the abuse?
  • Do the parents blame the child/see it as her/his fault?
  • Has the perpetrator accepted full responsibility for the abuse?
  • How is this demonstrated?
  • What treatment did he/she have?
  • Who else in the family/community network could help protect the new baby?
  • How did the parent(s) relate to professionals? what is their current attitude?

In circumstances where the perpetrator is the prospective father or is living in the household, where there is no acknowledgement of responsibility, where the non abusing parent blames the child and there is no prospect of effective intervention within the appropriate time-scale, then confidence in the safety of the newborn baby and subsequent child will be poor.

Circumstances where the perpetrator is convicted for posing a risk to children (have they served a custodial sentence for sexual offences and did they participate in a treatment plan?) and is already living in a family with other children, (albeit with social work involvement), should not detract from the need for a pre-birth assessment. In all assessments, it is important to maintain the focus on both prospective parents, and any other adults living in the household and not to concentrate solely on the mother.

When a person ‘who presents as a risk to children’ has been previously assessed, the qualifications of the assessor and the quality of the assessment must be updated and reviewed, as part of any current assessments.

7.2 Concern: Mental Health

See Children of Parents with a Mental Health Problem Procedure.

Although most parents with psychiatric problems are able to care for their children appropriately, research has indicated that child-maltreating parents are often shown to have mental health problems e.g. depression, history of attempted suicide, schizophrenia etc. Non-compliance with medication without medical supervision is a cause for concern.

Children are at increased risk of abuse by psychotic parents when incorporated into their delusional thinking e.g. “(the baby) is trying to punish me for my sins”.

Practitioners will obviously seek to obtain a psychiatric assessment in these cases, but must not become “paralysed” if that is not forthcoming. It is essential to continue the assessment based on the behaviour of the parent(s), not the diagnosis, and the potential risk of that behaviour to the new-born child. In addition, where there are mental health risk factors identified, ongoing re evaluation of risk is essential.

7.3 Concern: Substance Abuse

See Children of Parents who Misuse Drugs or Alcohol Procedure.

Drug or alcohol misuse is not in itself a contra-indication that the parent(s) will be unable to care safely for the baby, but practitioners will need to analyse:

  • The pattern of drug use and alcohol misuse and the likely impact on the baby/child as they grow/develop;
  • Whether it can be managed compatibly with the demands of a new-born child;
  • Whether the parent(s) are willing to attend for treatment, and the consequences for the baby of the mother’s substance misuse during pregnancy e.g. withdrawal symptoms.

When a pre-birth assessment is being undertaken, the child is, as yet, unborn and unknown but there may be indicators e.g.:

  • Antenatal Depression;
  • The child may be at risk of a premature birth and therefore vulnerable and likely to stay in hospital for a period after delivery;
  • Mother’s misuse of substances may result in the child having withdrawal symptoms or foetal alcohol syndrome;
  • Circumstances that may lead to the child being perceived as unwanted by either parent.

It is essential that there is close liaison with the midwives and obstetricians in relation to these factors.

7.4 Concern: Domestic Abuse and Violence

See Domestic Violence and Abuse Procedure.

When assessing domestic violence and abuse the social worker will establish if the parent known to Multi Agency Risk Assessment Conference (MARAC), Multi-Agency Public Protection Panel (MAPPA) or Domestic Violence Officer (DVO) and ensure full forensic history of violence of each parent, or adult who will have significant contact with the unborn baby as possible given consents and whether being assessed under S17 or S47 or the Children Act.

The social worker will obtain evidence of the nature of violent incidents, their frequency and severity and the triggers for them.

Risks are greater when a parent with unresolved care and control conflicts is caring for a baby with particular characteristics which may make him/her harder to care for e.g. a poor feeder or sleeper, constant crying, a disabled child etc. (Reder and Duncan, 1995, p.49; Reder and Duncan, 1999, pp. 62-71).

7.5 Concern: Previous Children Removed

A viability assessment will be undertaken of any adult who is not the child’s parent but who is expected to be part of a child protection plan to safeguard the child. This is typically a grandparent or members of the family and friends, with whom the plan is for the parent(s) and new born baby to live. The relative / friend who is given and accepts this role, will sign agreements to any child Protection Plan, be invited to all Child Protection meetings, Core Group/Pre-Birth meetings and be consulted by the child’s social worker.

Examination of the history of previous children who have been removed from the parent(s) care will indicate if there were particular characteristics which made that child harder to care for. It is essential to find out from the parent(s) what problems, if any, they identified in caring for that child.

7.6 Other Factors and Analysis

Caring for a new born baby is difficult enough for any parent but can be particularly stressful if the parent(s) are isolated and do not have a network of support. It is important to identify whether partners are going to share responsibility or whether it will fall to one, usually the mother.

Research (Reder and Duncan,1999, p.69)has indicated that when children have been abused the trigger may often be a family crisis e.g. loss of home or job, marital problems or upheavals, physical exhaustion etc. However, there are many other triggers and factors that will need to be considered within an assessment.

It is therefore important to identify the support networks that the parent(s) have, their financial and housing position. Clear guidelines are outlined in the Framework for Assessment of Children in Need and their Families.

Once the information has been collected it needs careful analysis. This should be a shared process with the other agencies involved, particularly the midwives and obstetricians. This will be primarily the task of the inter-agency information sharing meeting and the core group.

If the assessment identifies that there are clear risks to a newborn baby then key judgements will be:

  • Whether there is evidence of the parent(s’) capacity to change;
  • Will the provision of support and services be sufficient to enable the parent(s) to care safely for their baby?
  • Will they be able to change in time for the baby’s birth?
  • Whether the parents have appropriate support networks.


8. When Family Plan to Move/Has Moved

When there are significant concerns and the whereabouts of the mother are not known, Children's Services must inform other agencies and local authorities in accordance with procedures about children who go missing. See Children who go Missing Including from School Procedure.

If there are significant concerns and the case is being transferred to another local authority, Children Moving Across Local Authority Boundaries Procedure must be followed and transfer should not deter the originating authority from initiating or continuing Care proceedings.


9. Flowchart of the Multi-Agency Pre-Birth Protocol

Click here to view the Flowchart of the Multi-Agency Pre-Birth Protocol


10. Supports for the Pre-Birth Process

Understanding and assessing risk correctly in pre birth assessments is a complex process. In addition to this we have denial of pregnancy, concealment of pregnancy, substance misuse disorders, multiparity, and financial barriers to care are associated with a lack of seeking prenatal care. See Recognition of Child Abuse 5th Edition.

10.1 Health Liaison Meetings

Across the county monthly Health Liaison Meetings are held. These meetings are chaired by the Named Safeguarding Midwife in each area and attended by:

  • A representative from Children Services’ Specialist and Safeguarding Teams (CSS&SS) will attend these meetings (Team Manager or delegated appropriately);
  • Peri-natal psychiatry, Crime Reduction Initiative, Domestic Violence Officer, Herts Community Service (Learning Disabilities, Hertfordshire Partnership Trust’s Community Mental Health Team and teenage pregnancy co-ordinators should be invited as appropriate. This is an outcome of learning from Serious Case Reviews.

The purpose of these meetings is to:

  • Discuss risk and assess unborn baby concerns, and to consider threshold for referral to safeguarding teams for pre-birth assessment; and
  • Gain updates from CS&SS in respect to progression of pre-birth assessments/pre-birth plans and discharge plans where unborn child is allocated to a social worker within CS&SS.

An attendance sheet will accompany the Pregnancy and Complex Social Factors Spreadsheet, which will also serve as the minutes of the previous meeting. Any issues regarding attendance should be addressed through the established HSCB escalation process.

The Spreadsheet will be distributed to nominated professionals from partner agencies one week before the meeting to enable updates to be obtained, and to allow for agency representatives sufficient time to consider if attendance would be helpful.

10.2 Advice

Social Care Safeguarding Advice

Each Assessment team will identify a lead pre birth SW who can mentor and support other social workers completing pre birth assessments

A named lead pre birth social worker across each district will be available to offer telephone consultations to other professionals. The geographical areas that they cover will be:

Broxbourne; East Herts; Dacorum; St Albans; Stevenage; North Herts; Watford; Three Rivers; Wel/Hat; and Hertsmere.

In some areas there will be one named pre-birth social worker for a double district.

Early Intervention Advice

For cases that do not meet the threshold for social care intervention, advice and guidance will be offered to practitioners by the Targeted Advice Service (TAS) in the first instance. Local support is available for CAF and Team Around the Child arrangements.

Regular re evaluation of the plan, especially immediately after the birth, will be critical, and a re referral into social care should be made if the situation deteriorates or professionals are in any doubt about the safety of the baby.

In case of disputes between professionals about how a case should be managed and/or under which process, professionals should follow the agreed dispute resolution procedures within their own agencies. Ultimately, a case may need to be discussed by the respective Heads of Service of the affected agencies.

Specific inter-agency Safeguarding training will be provided around pre birth assessment through the HSCB Learning and Development programme, where this protocol will be fully explained.


Appendix 1: Bibliography

  • Hertfordshire Safeguarding Children Board Safeguarding Procedures;
  • Brandon,M, Howe,D, Belderson, P, Black, J, Dodsworth, J, Gardner, R and Warren, C (2008) Analysing child deaths and serious injury through abuse and neglect: what can we learn? A biennial analysis of serious case reviews 2003-2005, London, DCSF;
  • Calder MC and Hackett S (eds.) (2003) Assessment in childcare: Using and developing frameworks for practice. Dorset: Russell House Publishing;
  • Hart, Di (2000), “Assessment Prior to Birth” in Horwath, Jan (Ed) (2000) The Child’s World: assessing children in need - Reader, Department of Health, NSPCC, University of Sheffield;
  • HM Govt (2010) Working Together to Safeguard Children: A guide to interagency working to safeguard and promote the welfare of children, London, DCSF;
  • Reder, Peter and Clare Lucey (1995) “Significant Issues in the Assessment of Parenting”; (1995) in Reder, Peter and Clare Lucey 1995) Assessment of Parenting: psychiatric and psychological contributions (1995) Routledge, London;
  • Reder, Peter and Sylvia Duncan (1999), Lost Innocents: a Follow-Up Study of Fatal Child Abuse, Routledge, London;
  • Ofsted (2008) Learning lessons, taking action: Ofsted’s evaluations of serious case reviews 1 April 2007 to 31 March 2008, London, Ofsted;
  • Ofsted (2009) Learning lessons from serious case reviews: year 2, London, Ofsted;
  • Rose,W and Barnes, J (2008) Improving Safeguarding Practice: Study of Serious Case Reviews 2001- 2003, London, DCSF/Open University;
  • Sinclair, R and Bullock, R (2002) Learning from Past Experience – A Review of Serious Case Reviews, London, DoH.

End